Specific Support Action
Contract n° 006468 (SSPE)


     
 

OBJECTIVES

RATIONALE

GEOTRACEABILITY

WORKPLAN

PUBLICATIONS

INTRANET

CONTACT

WP2 : Inventory of legislation and geotraceability data management

2) Report on the inventory of the use of space data in the LPIS/GIS

SUMMARY

The objective of this delivrable is to gain in understanding the technical and operational aspects of the IACS systems related to the use of remote sensing data or the data capture and management system in the two test regions. It also realises a comparison of identifiers used by the IACS in the different member countries.

In both regions of interest (Gers department and Walloon region), the IACS data capture follows a similar management plan which can be summarized in 4 steps: (i) printing of application forms by Administration and sending them to farmers, (ii) filling in aid applications by farmers and sending them back to Administration, (iii) graphic and administrative encoding, control and (iv) finally restitution of payment to farmers. All the information collected in this report about the IACS data capture and management systems currently in force in the test regions give a good overview of the functioning of the systems. A comparison of results allowed to bring out the common characteristics of both systems as well as their differences and to anticipate where changes for traceability and certification specificities have to be introduced.

In the two test regions, there exist similarities between the farm codification systems, which in both cases comprise a number for the farmer and another one for its production units, but the codes used for units have no explicit geographical reference. The basic control units also differ (farm blocks or parcels) and the identifier used for the IACS systems are not really structured. These identifiers have no geographical character. This comparison between identifiers used by the IACS in the different countries authorizes to put in evidence the possibility to have recourse to geo-identifiers in the frame of an integrated geo-traceability approach.

With respect to traceability purposes the use of a unique geo-identifier should allow to facilitate data exchange. Through the comparison of parcel identifiers in the two test regions, it was possible to bring out the basis to define the characteristics of a unique geotraceability identification and coding system which will be developed in WP3.